Variance vs. Special Exception
A variance is zoning relief granted because a hardship unique to the property makes strict compliance unreasonable, such as an oddly shaped lot. A special exception is a use the zoning ordinance already allows in the district when stated conditions are met and the public interest is served. The variance turns on hardship, the special exception on public interest.
Zoning relief sits in the Land Use and Legal Descriptions section of the national exam. Questions describe a property owner who wants to build, use, or alter something, then ask which form of zoning relief applies and what standard governs it.
All Land Use, Legal Descriptions and Contract Law practice questions
Two ways to get around a zoning rule
Zoning tells owners what they may build and how they may use the land. When a property owner cannot follow the code as written, the board of appeals can grant relief in more than one form. Two of those forms, the variance and the special exception, look similar on the surface but rest on completely different logic. Mixing them up is one of the most common errors on the exam.
What a variance is
A variance is permission to depart from a zoning requirement because of a hardship that is unique to the property. The classic example is a lot that is oddly shaped, too narrow, or sits on a steep slope, so strict compliance with a setback or height rule would be nearly impossible to meet. The owner must show the hardship grows out of the land itself, not out of their own circumstances, because a hardship shared by the whole neighborhood is not enough. Variances can be for area (setbacks, height, lot coverage) or for use, and use variances are the harder to obtain. Some states do not allow use variances at all, so check the jurisdiction when a question makes that relevant.
What a special exception is
A special exception, also called a conditional use permit, is different in kind. Here the zoning ordinance already lists the use as permitted in that district, but only if certain conditions are met. A church in a residential zone, a daycare in a commercial zone, or a hospital in a light industrial zone are common examples. The board is not bending the code, it is applying a rule the code already wrote. The deciding factor is the public interest and whether the proposed use fits the comprehensive plan, not whether the owner suffers hardship.
The same idea, three labels
It helps to line these up with a third category, the nonconforming use. A nonconforming use was legal when it began and was later grandfathered in when the zoning changed, so the owner never had to ask for relief. It is not a variance and not a special exception, and it can be lost through abandonment or sometimes when the property is conveyed. Keep the three apart: nonconforming means it was legal before, variance means hardship now, and special exception means the ordinance already allows it with conditions.
An example
A homeowner wants a taller fence than the code allows and argues it is needed for privacy and security. That is a request to relax a development standard because of the owner's situation and the lot, which points to a variance. Now change the fact pattern: a church wants to build a small sanctuary in a residential district. The ordinance names places of worship as a conditional use, so the request is a special exception, decided on the public interest rather than hardship. Same board, same hearing, opposite standard.
How this appears on the exam
Find the trigger word. If the scenario mentions hardship, an odd lot, or relief from a setback or height rule, choose the variance. If it mentions a use the ordinance already permits with conditions, or asks what the key consideration is, choose the special exception and answer public interest. Distractors love to plant hardship in a special exception question, and public interest in a variance question, so read which question you are actually being asked.
Memory trick
PUSH
Decide between the two by asking what the owner is really seeking. P-U-S-H points you to the right relief.
- P
Public interest governs: a special exception is granted when the use serves the public interest and the comprehensive plan
- U
Use already allowed: the ordinance lists the use as permitted in that district, so the board applies a rule rather than bending one
- S
Special hardship required: a variance requires a hardship tied to the land, such as its shape, size, or topography
- H
Hardship unique to the parcel: the hardship must come from the property itself, not from the owner's personal or financial situation
Screenshot this: PUSH is how you'll remember variance vs. special exception on exam day.
How the exam tricks you on this
The classic trap is reaching for hardship when the question is asking about a special exception. A special exception turns on the public interest and whether the use is already listed as permitted in the district. Hardship is the standard for a variance, not for a special exception, and the two get swapped constantly.
Two more patterns to watch:
- The use was legal when built. A legal nonconforming use (grandfathered in) is a third category. It is not a variance and not a special exception, and it can be lost when the use is abandoned or the property changes hands.
- Area versus use relief. A variance can be for area (a setback or height) or for use. Use variances are the harder to obtain and some states prohibit them outright. A special exception is always about a use the ordinance already names.
Try real exam questions on variance vs. special exception
These come straight from our question bank: answer to see the explanation instantly.
The key consideration in granting a zoning exception known as a special exception is which of the following?
Tip: press 1–4 to answer, Enter for the next question.
Related terms
Eminent Domain vs. Police Power
Eminent domain is the government's power to take private property for public use in exchange for just compensation: think a highway project condemning a strip of land. Police power is the government's power to regulate how property is used, without taking it or paying for the restriction: think zoning, building codes, and health ordinances. The dividing line is simple: eminent domain transfers title and requires payment; police power restricts use and requires neither.
Read definitionEasements
An easement is a nonpossessory right to use another person's land for a specific, limited purpose: a shared driveway, a utility line, access to a road. The holder can use the land but never owns it. Easements appurtenant benefit a neighboring parcel and transfer with the land; easements in gross benefit a person or company instead.
Read definitionBundle of Rights
The bundle of rights is the set of legal rights that comes with owning real estate: disposition, exclusion, enjoyment, possession, and control. Ownership isn't one single right: it's a bundle of separate "sticks," and each stick can be kept, sold, leased, or given away on its own.
Read definitionMetes and Bounds
Metes and bounds is a legal description system that defines a parcel by its boundary lines, using reference points, compass directions (angles), and distances. The description begins at a point of beginning, follows each boundary around the perimeter, and returns to that same point to enclose the property. It is common for irregular parcels and rural land.
Read definition
See if you'd pass
Take a free real estate practice test, instant scoring, no signup required.