Price Fixing
Price fixing is an agreement among competing brokers to set commission rates or other prices instead of letting each firm compete. It is an antitrust violation under fair trade laws. Brokers may set their own rates and share them with clients, but they may not discuss or agree on rates with competing brokers.
Antitrust and fair trade practices are tested in the brokerage operations portion of the national exam. Questions give two brokers who agree on a commission rate, or brokers who gang up on a competitor, and ask which violation occurred, so the tested skill is spotting collusion among competitors.
All Brokerage Business and Sale Contracts practice questions
Why antitrust law reaches real estate
Brokers compete for clients, and competition is supposed to set the price of their services. When competitors instead agree on that price, they replace competition with collusion, and that is what antitrust and fair trade laws forbid. Real estate brokerage is a business like any other, so the same rules that stop manufacturers or retailers from fixing prices apply to brokers and their commission rates.
What price fixing is
Price fixing is an agreement among competitors to set prices rather than let them be set by the market. In real estate this usually means brokers agreeing on a commission rate or a minimum fee. Two agents from different firms who get together and settle on a standard commission for residential listings have committed price fixing, even if the rate is reasonable and even if they never write it down. The agreement itself is the offense; the harm is that buyers and sellers lose the benefit of a competitive market.
What is allowed
The line is bright but easy to cross in conversation. A brokerage sets its own commission rate and may tell a client what its usual fee is. What brokers may not do is discuss or agree on rates with competing brokers. Independent decision making is fine, joint decision making is not. If a question describes a broker publishing their own fees to their own clients, that is lawful. If it describes brokers coordinating rates, that is the violation.
The cousins of price fixing
Price fixing is one face of a broader antitrust category that also includes market allocation and group boycotting. Market allocation is when competitors divide territory or clients, agreeing that one firm takes this area and another takes that one. Group boycotting is when several competitors agree to refuse to deal with a particular rival, for instance agreeing in an MLS not to show one broker's listings. Both are fair trade violations, and both remove competition just as price fixing does. They appear as distractors and as answers, so learn to name each one.
Example: the county seat agreement
Competing brokers in a county seat agree on a standard commission rate for principal transactions within the county. No one is forced to charge it, the brokers simply settle on it among themselves. That agreement is price fixing, and it can violate antitrust and fair trade laws. Compare that to a brokerage that decides on its own to charge a certain rate and advertises that fee to the public. Same number, opposite legality. The difference is whether the number came from cooperation among competitors or from each firm's independent choice.
Consequences and the exam angle
Antitrust penalties in this area can be serious and can touch a broker's license and business, which is why the rules are tested directly. On the exam, find the verb of cooperation. If competitors agreed on a rate, the answer is price fixing. If they agreed to shun a rival, the answer is group boycotting or fair trade violation. If they simply set their own rate or told a client their own fee, there is no violation at all. Train your eye to spot the words agree and among brokers, because that is where these questions are won.
Memory trick
FIX
Three forbidden moves among competitors: F-I-X.
- F
Fix prices together: competing brokers agreeing on commission rates is price fixing, an antitrust violation
- I
Independent rates: each firm sets its own commission and may tell clients its own rate without checking with rivals
- X
eXclude a rival: group boycotting, where competitors refuse to deal with one broker, is another antitrust violation
Screenshot this: FIX is how you'll remember price fixing on exam day.
How the exam tricks you on this
The classic trap is confusing a broker stating their own commission rate with price fixing by agreement. A firm may set its own rates and tell a client its usual fee; that is lawful competition. Price fixing requires competitors to discuss or agree on rates together, an arrangement that removes competition. Watch for the words discuss, agree, standard rate among brokers, or minimum rate.
Two more patterns to watch:
- Group boycotting looks different but is the same family. When several brokers agree to refuse to show a rival's listings or otherwise shut them out, that is an antitrust violation under fair trade practices. It is not price fixing, but it belongs to the same category of collusion, so read what the brokers actually agreed to do.
- Antitrust, not disclosure or contract law. A stem may throw in the Statute of Frauds or the Uniform Commercial Code as distractors. Commission-setting agreements among competitors are an antitrust and fair trade issue, so pick the fair trade or antitrust answer when brokers conspire on rates or market access.
Try real exam questions on price fixing
These come straight from our question bank: answer to see the explanation instantly.
Competing brokers in a county seat agree on a standard commission rate for principals within the county. This is a possible violation of
Tip: press 1–4 to answer, Enter for the next question.
Related terms
Commingling vs. Conversion
Commingling is mixing client funds, such as escrow or earnest money, with the broker's personal or operating funds. Conversion goes further: it is the actual use of client money for the broker's own purposes. Commingling is improper bookkeeping; conversion is taking the money, and it carries harsher penalties.
Read definitionFiduciary Duties
Fiduciary duties are the six legal obligations a real estate agent owes their client: obedience, loyalty, disclosure, confidentiality, accounting, and reasonable care, remembered as OLDCAR. They require the agent to place the client's interests above everyone else's, including the agent's own.
Read definitionTypes of Listing Agreements
There are four main types of listing agreement: open listing, exclusive agency, exclusive right to sell, and net listing. They differ in one thing, who the broker gets paid by. Under an open listing the broker is paid only if they are the one who brings the buyer, under exclusive agency the owner can still sell the property themselves and owe nothing, and under exclusive right to sell the broker earns a commission no matter who sells.
Read definitionBlockbusting
Blockbusting is the illegal practice of inducing property owners to sell or rent by suggesting that a change in the neighborhood's racial or ethnic makeup will lower property values. The Fair Housing Act prohibits it. It differs from steering, which channels buyers by race, and from redlining, which refuses lending in an area.
Read definition
See if you'd pass
Take a free real estate practice test, instant scoring, no signup required.